But they sure do help–by giving them HIV. Or that’s what the Vatican would have you believe.
I understand why they made that (paraphrased) statement a couple days ago, more accurately that condoms are never a good thing and actually do cause AIDS by the indirect means pushing people to have more sex.
They’re the Vatican; they have to come out and set some moral standards because if they condoned condoms, they could potentially be condoning what most people use condoms for: have sex outside of marriage. The Vatican could never condone that. Which is too bad, because in keeping this stance (which in some ways is downright selfish), the Vatican has managed to hurt the very people they want to help.
Let’s role-play here. You’re standing in front of a fancy hotel with a condom in your pocket. An unmarried, young couple runs up the stairs, holding each other and laughing hysterically. One of them asks you, “Excuse me, do you have a condom? We’re gonna have sex and I forgot mine.” Are you going to give them the one in your pocket? Or refuse them on the basis of moral standard?
The above situation by itself is absurd, but take it or leave it, situations tantamount to this example do exist around the world: brothel houses, prostitution rings, and yes, many places in Africa.
We have a choice here. Cling to our standard: never promote condoms because it encourages people to have sex by taking away some of the potential negative consequences. This isn’t a baseless line of reasoning; no would one deny that everyone would eat more junk food if it didn’t make you fat, give you diabetes, hurt your body.
But this isn’t an ideal world, and to cling to ideals when they clearly aren’t applicable or downright fail, is to do a grave injustice to your neighbors and friends. The Vatican has shown that on their list of priorities, idealism and a vocal standard are more important than the lives of people.
People have sex and don’t use condoms and are much more likely to spread HIV–or people have sex and do use condoms and HIV decreases.
Given those two situations, I know what I’d choose.